Social Internet Culture {The Egyptian Explained }
The Rise of the “Content Creator” Label
I just noticed a lot of social media marketing activists now brand themselves as “content creators.”
Checking social media content is entertaining for many, but after scrolling through endless reels, stories, and posts, some enlightening concepts about this “content creation” world just surfaced in my perception.
Observatory Findings from the Scroll
Personal Life as Brand – Getting your kid from school, putting them to bed—now that’s “content.”
Relationship Goals – Showcasing perfect, fun relationships with intimate couple moments? Also content.
Get Ready With Me – Outfits, makeup, and that flirty “comment please” smile—all content.
Sponsored Smiles – Occasionally posting a polished pic featuring a paid partnership? You guessed it—content.
The Reality Behind the Filter
Reality shows? Over-edited and dramatized. Emotional “spontaneous” moments? Professionally filmed. Because your attention, sympathy, and compassion—dear audience—translate directly into money, babe.
So bravo to all the “content creation gurus.” Perhaps you just needed a polished title to replace “influencer” or “fashionista.”
Influencers, Fashionistas, and Prestige
Cinematic Emotion: The Drama of Digital Life
Tragic hospital scenes, surprise proposals, emotional breakdowns—beautifully shot in cinematic lighting. The likes and sympathy flow according to how dramatic the capture is.
Humans are naturally drawn to emotional display. What better way to express and impress than through a blend of acting, aesthetics, and carefully edited cinematography?
The Social Internet and Political Awakening
The concept of social media is relatively new, but its impact was revolutionary—literally. During the Egyptian Revolution (2011), Facebook became the epicenter of activism. It connected citizens, shared live updates, and gave the youth a voice (Tufekci, 2017).
The government even cut off internet and telecom networks to suppress communication. That’s how powerful Facebook was.
After the revolution, the platform exploded—events, posts, pages, comments—it became a living archive of chaos and hope. The digital public sphere (Papacharissi, 2015) took root in Egypt.
From Connection to Creation
Before all that, Facebook was just for posting pictures and chatting. Afterward, it transformed into a social battleground, news hub, and cultural diary.
The dramas, overacting, and constant self-display flood every feed. Copycats multiply. Anything that sells is replicated endlessly. Authenticity? Optional.
Public Display of the Private Self
We now live in a world of publicized hypocrisy, where even shame is displayed proudly—disguised as celebration. Reality shows taught us that lesson long ago.
People watch fabricated lives, fully aware they’re fake—yet still engage, like, and subscribe. Because nothing feels better than knowing you’re watching a lie while secretly enjoying it.
The Psychology of Watching
Watching reality shows (and influencer reels) reveals more about us than we think:
The Power of the Watcher – We like to watch others while staying unseen—a ghostly observer who “knows.”
The Illusion of Closeness – Commenting and reacting gives us a sense of intimacy with people we’ll never meet.
Emotional Manipulation – These shows trigger joy, anger, sadness—all crafted to keep you watching.
It’s the perfect formula: manufactured emotion sold as reality.
Reel Reality vs. Real Reality
Because the “reel reality” always wins—it’s shinier, safer, and easier to control.
We deny it, of course, because we love to pretend we see through it. But the numbers don’t lie: likes, shares, and views are the real metrics of belief.
Lights, Camera, Hypocrisy
To those still wondering: yes, you can manipulate numbers, edit truths, and manufacture moments. But some numbers don’t lie.
🎬 And 3, 2, 1… ACTION!
Following, not sure
Watching, of course
Buying, not at all
References (APA Style)
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Marwick, A. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
Senft, T. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks. Peter Lang.
Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. Emerald Publishing.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.


Comments
Post a Comment